Final Cut Comparison Post part 1

Both my opening sequence and Trap (2024) use dark lighting and eerie music to build suspense right from the start. They create an unsettling atmosphere that draws the audience in and makes them anticipate what will happen next. Both also rely on slow-building tension rather than jumping straight into action, which helps establish mystery. The framing in both openings is carefully thought out, using close-ups and shadows to add to the ominous feel. However, there are clear differences due to budget, time, and resources. Trap has professional cinematography, lighting, and sound design, making it look more polished and cinematic. My project, on the other hand, uses more practical effects and accessible equipment, giving it a raw, indie feel. Trap also benefits from a bigger budget, allowing for high-quality special effects and complex sets, while my sequence takes place in a more contained environment. Another difference is the pacing—Trap builds suspense slowly, while my sequence moves a bit faster to capture the audience’s attention right away. Despite these differences, both openings effectively set up a sense of mystery, proving that a compelling story and strong atmosphere can create suspense even without a Hollywood-level production. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What movie I would like to make

Genre Conventions for final blog post