Creative Critical Reflection Research: Interview version

Doing an interview is the easiest and cheapest. I could use a family member, friend, or teacher to ask me these questions and set up my phone to record. I would publish on platforms that have lots of consumers but are affordable, if not free. For those who want to put themselves out there. Interview also wouldn't take so much time, so I wouldn't have to set up something very far in advance. If I had to choose between the two of the options, I would prefer an interview.

My film mostly sticks to typical murder mystery conventions in the plot, but using teenagers as actors can represent a little bit of social groups, but it doesn’t really dive into deeper issues. It represents the way teens interact, but not necessarily any major social problems. I engage with my audience by making the film feel like the viewer is there in the storyline with the actors but also is able to see the predicted future. This makes it more suspenseful and interactive. If this were a real media product, it could be shared on platforms like YouTube, where people regularly consume content. Throughout the project, my production skills improved a lot. I learned how to edit better, use cinematography techniques, and put together a story visually. I worked with camcorders and computers to film and edit, which helped me understand the technical side of filmmaking. I also used different software to edit my footage, add effects, and improve the overall quality. The whole process involved lots of planning shots, filming, and then editing everything together to make a cohesive final product. If I were to do an interview about this, I’d explain how I structured my film, the techniques I used, and how my skills evolved. I’d also include screenshots of my editing process or behind-the-scenes pictures to show how the project came together.